Our Choice: Petrolism or Patriotism

#182, January 18, 2006

 

Two decades ago, City Council Member Michael Davis and I served on a subcommittee for the 1987 General Plan development. Being advocates of green energy, we made sure the GP contained a provision to encourage buildings to be aligned for maximizing use of the sun. I’d quote an energy activist I’d met in my Carter-era days as a Congressional aide: “today’s home built without solar in mind is tomorrow’s retrofit problem.”

 

Tomorrow came and went, and our part of the plan was forgotten. Homes went up slavishly facing the asphalt, not the sun. Solar subdivisions didn’t blossom; they didn’t even sprout. But I knew what to look for, and was lucky. Ten years ago I found a new tract home that had its living area stretched along an east-west axis, facing south. Careful use of window blinds provides “solar tempering”, shaving 5-10% from my natural gas bill. When the photovoltaic panels went up in 2002, it was a snap: the roof was at the optimum solar orientation. My latest power bill was $110… for all of 2005. For the two prior years it was zero.

 

Economist Milton Friedman said “There’s no such thing as a free lunch”, a commentary on the Great Society social welfare programs. Yes, renewable energy is not free-- an investment is required.  But it’s far cheaper than fossil energy, when you count the direct subsidies to oil companies, plus the trillion dollars (not to mention the lives) we’ll end up spending for “democracy” (and military bases) in the oily Middle East, plus the incalculable cost of climate disruption. Our recent flood’s combination of high tide and heavy rain cost one third of a billion bucks in the North Bay alone. I read how continued melting of the Arctic ice pack is freshening the north Atlantic waters, that someday soon it may enough to shut down the Gulf Stream, the thermohaline conveyor belt that brings Caribbean warmth to the northern latitudes. A new ice age for Europe and the American east cost could be triggered in our lifetime. What’s the cost of that?

 

Columnist *Thomas* Friedman recently described another cost of oil. Our energy habits are underwriting “petrolism…the corrupting, antidemocratic governing practices - in oil states from Russia to Nigeria and Iran - that result from a long run of $60-a-barrel oil.”  Petrolist state autocrats use their oil money to keep themselves in power by buying off or bullying opposition within and outside their country. Mount a serious challenge to Iran’s “peaceful” nuclear energy program, and you risk having your gas prices jacked up and your economy ruined. Meanwhile, the petrolists live in luxury while suppressing, often brutally, the aspirations of their people. Who needs an educated, liberated populace to fuel the economic engine when you can just extort more cash from the American oil addicts? If you want a visceral understanding of how petrolism works, go see the critically-acclaimed film Syriana.

 

How can Petalumans save money while helping protect the Gulf Stream and depose the American-hating Iranian petrolists? The City Council will soon be voting on a “green building” ordinance. The ordinance would set standards for new residential and commercial buildings, resulting in drastically reduced energy and water consumption. To get the most “mileage”, the ordinance should be crafted specifically for Petaluma, even if the initial investment is somewhat larger.

 

The City Council could enact this ordinance for financial reasons: to help citizens and business enjoy lower expenses, and to stimulate the local economy (less money paid out to energy companies means more money spent in town.) And they could do it for patriotism. As Friedman says, we need leaders “with the guts not just to invade Iraq, but to also impose a gasoline tax and inspire conservation at home. That takes a real energy policy with long-term incentives for renewable energy - wind, solar, biofuels.” He concludes: “Enough of this Bush-Cheney nonsense that conservation, energy efficiency and environmentalism are some hobby we can't afford. I can't think of anything more cowardly or un-American. Real patriots, real advocates of spreading democracy around the world, live green. Green is the new red, white and blue.”